Head-to-head · N°02

A signed ledger, not a PDF.

A point-in-time audit produces a spreadsheet and a slide deck that is stale the moment it is delivered. TrustFix produces signed, offline-verifiable evidence — current as of the last scan, and provable by anyone.

01 · Credit where it's due

Where a manual audit helps

  • Human judgment on context, intent, and edge cases.
  • A defensible point-in-time snapshot for a specific date.
  • A narrative tailored to a specific auditor or board.
02 · The gap

Where it falls short

  • Stale the day after it is delivered — posture keeps moving.
  • Findings live in spreadsheets and PDFs: not verifiable, not replayable.
  • Re-running it means repeating the manual effort and cost.
  • No coverage in the gap between audits.
03 · What changes with TrustFix

What TrustFix adds

  • Re-scannable coverage — the posture is current as of the last scan, not once a quarter.
  • Every figure is clickable back to a signed, offline-verifiable receipt.
  • Standards-based exports (W3C VC, OSCAL, OCSF, did:key) anyone can verify without an account.
  • Replay the exact posture at any point in time from the same signed ledger.
04 · Side by side

At a glance

Capability
Manual audit
TrustFix
Point-in-time snapshot
Human context & narrative
–
Re-scannable coverage
—
Signed, offline-verifiable evidence
—
Standards-based export (OSCAL · OCSF · VC)
—
Replay any point in time
—
Category-level view of typical offerings (2026). Specific capabilities vary by vendor and tier.

Audit once.
Or re-prove it on every scan.

Book a demoExplore the platform →
TrustFix vs a manual audit · TrustFix | TrustFix